Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784603

--- Comment #3 from Haïkel Guémar <[email protected]> 2012-01-25 22:23:58 
EST ---
* python26-xxx variants in EPEL5 are different packages, you'd need to submit
another review
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/search?match=glob&type=package&terms=python26*
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=782613 (an example of python26
variant ticket)
* for the summary, it's better than the previous one.
* python3 variant builds fine and is usable.

To me, your package fully complies with Fedora guidelines, you still have to be
formally reviewed by a sponsor (which usually will ask you to do 2 or 3
informal reviews), try asking on irc (#fedora-devel @ freenode) or the mailing
list.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
[email protected]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

Reply via email to