Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787510 --- Comment #4 from Michael Schwendt <[email protected]> 2012-02-06 08:00:36 EST --- > # The library consists of headers only > %define debug_package %{nil} Which effectively makes it a static-only package that requires special handling: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Packaging_Static_Libraries_2 > The %{name}-devel package contains libraries and header files for > developing applications that use %{name}. Contradictory. No library and no %{name} package exist. > %package doc > Summary: Documentation for %{name} > >%description doc > The %{name}-doc package contains documentation for the %{name} library. Same here. No %{name} package exists. * Build log on x64_64 contains lots of warnings about type-punning. Be careful, even if the test suite seems to pass. $ rpmlint glm* glm-devel.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/include/glm/gtx/ocl_type.inl glm-devel.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/include/glm/gtx/vec1.inl -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
