Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=794715 Alexander Kurtakov <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] Blocks| |182235(FE-Legal) --- Comment #1 from Alexander Kurtakov <[email protected]> 2012-02-17 07:48:44 EST --- The license field in the rpm should match the content. In this case if the sources you build from are with the OpenSymphony license this is the license. You should also consider legal about opensymphony license because sometimes adding a single word to license can make it non-free anymore. So for the package as is the license can not be ASL 2.0 unless this is what the sources state for. Blocking FE-LEGAL to get their opinion on the OpenSymphony license. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
