Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673792 --- Comment #6 from Erik van Pienbroek <[email protected]> 2012-02-25 16:58:54 EST --- Based on the review remarks in the mingw-header package here's an updated version of the mingw-crt package Updated Spec URL: http://svn.openftd.org/svn/fedora_cross/mingw-crt/mingw-crt.spec Updated SRPM URL: http://build1.openftd.org/fedora-cross/src/mingw-crt-2.0.999-0.4.trunk.20120224.fc18_cross.src.rpm * Sat Feb 25 2012 Erik van Pienbroek <[email protected]> - 2.0.999-0.4.trunk.20120224 - Update to mingw-w64 trunk 20120224 snapshot - Made the win64 pieces optional for now (pending approval of the mingw-gcc/mingw-binutils package reviews) - Dropped the use of the mingw_pkg_name macro - Eliminated some conditionals related to snapshot builds - Use smaller SourceForge source URLs - Improved summary of the various packages - Simplified the configure, make and make install calls - Dropped upstreamed patch - Added DISCLAIMER and DISCLAIMER.PD files - Added ZPLv2.1 to the license tag - Bumped obsoletes/provides version for mingw32-runtime -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
