Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=770615 --- Comment #4 from Rui Matos <[email protected]> 2012-03-05 11:00:06 EST --- After reading the packaging guidelines about Obsoletes/Provides I decided that it's better to only obsolete gnome-utils since this package doesn't provide any libs or devel stuff. Also I removed the Provides line since it seems to me that we can't claim that having baobab installed is the same as having gnome-utils. By this reasoning none of the new separated utilities should get the Provides line so I'm on the fence on this one. spec: http://glua.ua.pt/~rmatos/baobab.spec srpm: http://glua.ua.pt/~rmatos/baobab-3.3.2-1.fc16.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
