Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=798248 --- Comment #4 from Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda <[email protected]> 2012-03-09 01:53:53 EST --- - So, I have created a patch that unbundles the libraries and upstream has accepted it [1], so this solves the bundling issue. - As for the provides/obsoletes of virtual provides, I have discussed with two proven packagers and they agreed, that the proper way is to obsolete and provide both the package name and its virtual provide (which was ruby(dbus) = %{version}). So the proper tags for this package should be (already in the updated spec): Provides: ruby(dbus) = %{version} Provides: ruby-dbus = %{version}-%{release} Obsoletes: ruby(dbus) < 0.3.0 Obsoletes: ruby-dbus < 0.3.0-5 SPEC: http://bkabrda.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/ruby-dbus/rubygem-ruby-dbus.spec SRPM: http://bkabrda.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/ruby-dbus/rubygem-ruby-dbus-0.7.0-2.fc17.src.rpm Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3871637 [1] https://github.com/mvidner/ruby-dbus/pull/18 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
