Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=800930 --- Comment #35 from Martin Erik Werner <martinerikwer...@gmail.com> 2012-03-21 05:41:39 EDT --- Ah, excellent, as per that I'll keep my current cruft removal (which is currently zealous) pretty much as-is. I'll also do: - 1.2-7 - Move removal of Enet & fonts from %%prep to generate-tarball script - Re-add generate-tarball script as Source1 Should I be versioning my repacking by the way? Like redeclipse-1.2-fs3.tar.xz, in order to distinguish different repackings, or is that unnecessary since it's already contained in a versioned SRPM? spec URL: http://arand.fedorapeople.org/11/redeclipse.spec srpm URL: http://arand.fedorapeople.org/11/redeclipse-1.2-7.fc17.src.rpm Gen-tar : http://arand.fedorapeople.org/11/redeclipse-generate-tarball.sh -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
