Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=768538 Jon Ciesla <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |[email protected] AssignedTo|[email protected] |[email protected] Flag| |fedora-review? Bug 768538 depends on bug 754245, which changed state. Bug 754245 Summary: Review Request: ocaml-menhir - LR(1) parser generator for OCaml https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754245 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA Resolution| |ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED --- Comment #1 from Jon Ciesla <[email protected]> 2012-04-09 16:18:17 EDT --- Good: - rpmlint checks return: why3.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US provers -> proves, rovers, proverbs The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. Ignore. why3-emacs.noarch: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. why3-emacs-el.noarch: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. why3-xemacs.noarch: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. why3-xemacs-el.noarch: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. why3.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary why3-cpulimit Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page. why3.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary why3ml Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page. why3.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary why3config Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page. why3.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary why3bench Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page. why3.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary why3 Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page. why3.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary why3realize Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page. why3.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary why3replayer Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page. why3.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary why3doc Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page. why3.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary why3ide Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page. why3-all.x86_64: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. why3-coq.x86_64: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. Fix if possbile, examine at least. - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license ( LGPLv2 with exceptions ) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream - package compiles on devel (x86_64) - no missing BR Mock rawhide build fails, missing BuildRequires on sqlite-devel. After that it's fine. - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file Comment on why debuginfo is disabled, or enable it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
