Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812058 --- Comment #2 from Jon Ciesla <limburg...@gmail.com> 2012-04-17 15:23:17 EDT --- Good: - rpmlint checks return: zipios++.x86_64: I: enchant-dictionary-not-found pl.UTF-8 A dictionary for the Enchant spell checking library is not available for the language given in the info message. Spell checking will proceed with rpmlint's built-in implementation for localized tags in this language. For better spell checking results in this language, install the appropriate dictionary that Enchant will use for this language, often for example hunspell-* or aspell-*. Fix. zipios++.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/zipios++-0.1.5.9/COPYING The file is installed with executable permissions, but was identified as one that probably should not be executable. Verify if the executable bits are desired, and remove if not. Fix. And several ignorable spelling errors. - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license ( LGPLv2+ ) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english I cannot speak to the accuracy of the Polish, I should ask my dad. . . - source matches upstream N/A - package compiles on devel (x86_64) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok N/A - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file - devel package ok - no .la files - post/postun ldconfig ok - devel requires base package n-v-r Otherwise OK. So it's just the rpmlint stuff. I assume the only reason you're packaging software with no current upstream is as a dependency? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
