Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719854

--- Comment #65 from Ulrich Schwickerath <[email protected]> 
2012-04-26 06:00:17 EDT ---
Hi Vit,

thanks a lot for your help on this! 
I have another iteration on this ready now, as I also realised that since I
built this updated version there is finally an updated gem available from
rubyforge while the previous version was using what I directly got from the
author. 

https://uschwick.web.cern.ch/uschwick/software/rubygem-xmlparser.spec
https://uschwick.web.cern.ch/uschwick/software/rubygem-xmlparser-0.7.2.1-3.fc17.src.rpm

rpmlint output:

srpm:
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

binary (on fed17):

rubygem-xmlparser.x86_64: W: no-soname
/usr/lib64/gems/exts/xmlparser-0.7.2.1/lib/xmlparser.so
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.

Hopefully, this will be the final version. Any feedback on it is very welcome
before I proceed.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
[email protected]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

Reply via email to