Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=816975 --- Comment #5 from Peter Vrabec <[email protected]> 2012-05-03 05:05:21 EDT --- updated package is available here: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/pvrabec/mod_security/mod_security_crs.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/pvrabec/mod_security/mod_security_crs-2.2.4-2.fc16.src.rpm Some issues that you mentioned are fixed. What is not fixed? * MD5SUM this package : 160321534ba4859ccdb04ae1648fb51d MD5SUM upstream package : 62179bdbe8304e997ff206cb3bf62f12 This must be bug in fedora-review tool. :) I have double checked the sources from upstream and it was OK. * "Why are you using modsecurity.d instead of modesecurity?" I'm inclined to "modsecurity.d" for these reasons: - upstream prefers .d - we used to put rules files in .d directory - a main package (mod_security) use /etc/httpd/modsecurity.d/ for rules * perl and lua dependencies are not relevant because we don't ship any scripts in the package. * mod_security >= 2.6.5 & mod_security review mod_security-2.6.5 is already available in rawhide. The review is not needed. I hope the rest is OK. thnx. for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
