Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818454 --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka <[email protected]> 2012-05-07 09:37:37 EDT --- A bit more explanation: (In reply to comment #3) > > - Is there any specific reason why the -doc subpackage is not marked as > > noarch? > > If not, please make it noarch. > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/packaging/2012-May/008401.html So here the main package is arch specific (i.e. will be built on both i686 and x86_64). When -doc package is marked as %noarch, koji builds -doc subpackage on i686 and x86_64 _anyway_ and checks if the built -doc subpackage actually does not differ between i686 and x86_64, and sadly, currently ri file generation differs between archs. This problem doesn't appear (silently) when main package is also noarch - actually the arch under which the srpm will be rebuilt is either i686 or x86_64 (there is no such "noarch" builder), however only "one" arch is used, so the difference cannot be seen (silently). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
