Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739016

Peter Lemenkov <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Status Whiteboard|NotReady                    |

--- Comment #1 from Peter Lemenkov <[email protected]> 2012-05-15 10:32:16 EDT 
---
Cleaned up NotReady and updated up to 0.7.0

http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-poolboy.spec
http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-poolboy-0.7.0-1.fc18.src.rpm

Koji scratchbuild for F-18:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4078604

rpmlint:
sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SPECS: rpmlint
../RPMS/ppc/erlang-poolboy-0.7.0-1.fc18.ppc.rpm
../SRPMS/erlang-poolboy-0.7.0-1.fc18.src.rpm 
erlang-poolboy.ppc: E: no-binary
erlang-poolboy.ppc: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib

^^^ this one is tricky. All erlang packages must be installed into
%{_libdir}/erlang/lib so despite of the fact that some of them contains only
arch-independent data they all must be build as arch-dependent. I plan to fix
than but I wouldn't hold my breath.

erlang-poolboy.src: W: invalid-url Source0:
devinus-poolboy-0.7.0-0-g6aab8b8.tar.gz

^^^ blame github for that, not me.

2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings.
sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SPECS:

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
[email protected]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

Reply via email to