Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820642 Thomas Spura <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #18 from Thomas Spura <[email protected]> 2012-05-17 08:01:06 EDT --- Further issues: - %{optflags} are not honored: + /usr/bin/make gcc -c -g -O2 -Wall -DTLF_FONTS -DDEFAULTFONTDIR=\"/usr//share/figlet\" \ -DDEFAULTFONTFILE=\"standard\" -o figlet.o figlet.c - utf8.* has license ISC - Please write specifically which files have which license as comment in the spec file (Didn't found a file in the tarball, which would describe that...) - I'm +1 for the split into figlet-fonts, mentioned in comment #9. (In reply to comment #13) > John Cowan from the FIGlet development team informed us that: > > "Bitmap fonts are in the public domain in the U.S., because they are > considered insufficiently creative to copyright. Specifically, the actual > *appearance* of a font cannot be copyrighted, and bitmaps are considered > just a trivial transformation of the appearance. Scalable fonts are > computer programs, though, and are copyrightable." Who "considers [them] insufficently creative to copyright"? I'm highly suggesting blocking FE-LEGAL and being sure that the licensing issues are clear, when you have added the comment to the spec file, which file has which license... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
