https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818401
Kalev Lember <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #14 from Kalev Lember <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #12) > I addressed the fedora-review issues, but the unversioned .so > in %{_libdir}/0ad. If this really needs to be rpmlint silent, > I can work on making a fake -devel package and patch the > package to generate a versioned .so and link to it. > > Note that this would not the only package that has "modules" or > libraries in %{_libdir}/*/lib*.so Private unversioned libraries in %{_libdir}/0ad/ are perfectly fine, no need to do downstream patches to change this. It's also common to have an RPATH set that points to %{_libdir}/0ad/ : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Rpath_for_Internal_Libraries rpmlint is just a tool to warn about possible problems in the spec file. Sometimes its heuristics are right, sometimes not. There are often good reasons to ignore rpmlint warnings/errors, it doesn't have to be silent always. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
