https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=766166
--- Comment #18 from Lucas Stach <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #17) I may be a bit off here, but I don't think we need any libc to build libgcc and I agree that it's not a good idea to add any userspace to this compiler package. But I'm only interested in this package to generate bare-metal binaries like the kernel or a bootloader. This is not possible currently as gcc generates calls to libgcc to implement specific routines. Bare-metal binaries shouldn't need any libc or something similar, just a statically linkable libgcc.a. With this information in mind could you please re-evaluate this request? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
