https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804666

William Cohen <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|                            |needinfo?

--- Comment #5 from William Cohen <[email protected]> ---
Would it be possible to get this package reviewed and into Rawhide?

Updated the libpfm.spec file to include a patch for the python files. The new
libpfm.spec and libpfm-4.2.0-4.fc17.src.rpm are available at 

http://people.redhat.com/wcohen/libpfm/


The results of rpmlint are pretty minor:

$ rpmlint ../SRPMS/libpfm-4.2.0-4.fc17.src.rpm ../RPMS/x86_64/libpfm-*
libpfm.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) perf -> pref, per, perv
libpfm.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US perf -> pref, per, perv
libpfm.src:70: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build %global python_config
CONFIG_PFMLIB_NOPYTHON=n PYTHON_PREFIX=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{python_prefix}
libpfm.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) perf -> pref, per, perv
libpfm.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US perf -> pref, per, perv
libpfm.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libpfm.so
libpfm-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) perf -> pref, per, perv
libpfm-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US perf -> pref, per,
perv
libpfm-python.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) perf -> pref, per, perv
libpfm-python.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US perf -> pref,
per, perv
libpfm-python.x86_64: W: no-documentation
libpfm-static.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) perf -> pref, per, perv
libpfm-static.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US perf -> pref,
per, perv
libpfm-static.x86_64: W: no-documentation
6 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 14 warnings.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
[email protected]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

Reply via email to