https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820488
Stephen Gallagher <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] Flags| |needinfo?(negativo17@gmail. | |com) --- Comment #14 from Stephen Gallagher <[email protected]> --- I think you took the wrong approach there. I don't think we want to try to force mod_auth_xradius to link against libradius from https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823446 What I think we really want to do is modify this package (mod_auth_xradius) so that you can build the libradius sources it ships as a sub-package called 'libxradius' (and 'libxradius-devel'), which the main package will depend on. Then we have eliminated the bundling (without mandating that the sources themselves are stripped out) because we're providing a shared library that other packages can depend on. This is NOT bundling. Bundling means static linking. So let's see if we can take some clues from libradius in the other BZ and use that to build a shared library from the mod_auth_xradius sources in the same fashion, that mod_auth_xradius can link to. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
