https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830053

Parag AN(पराग) <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
              Flags|                            |fedora-review+

--- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) <[email protected]> ---
Review:

+ koji build f18 -> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4147698

+ rpmlint on rpms gave
ibus-libpinyin.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/share/ibus-libpinyin/setup/version.py
ibus-libpinyin.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/libexec/ibus-setup-libpinyin
ibus-libpinyin.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/share/ibus-libpinyin/setup/main2.py
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 0 warnings.
==> You can inform upstream to update fsf address

+ source verified with upstream as (sha1sum)
2fbc315711df1472cccd4849b3438d14faa65f94  ibus-libpinyin-1.4.0.tar.gz
2fbc315711df1472cccd4849b3438d14faa65f94 
../SOURCES/ibus-libpinyin-1.4.0.tar.gz

+ Package: ibus-libpinyin-1.4.0-1.fc18.x86_64
Provides: ibus-libpinyin = 1.4.0-1.fc18 ibus-libpinyin(x86-64) = 1.4.0-1.fc18
Requires: /bin/sh libc.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)(64bit) libdl.so.2()(64bit)
libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libgio-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
libibus-1.0.so.5()(64bit) liblua-5.1.so()(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit)
libopencc.so.1()(64bit) libpinyin.so.0()(64bit)
libpinyin.so.0(LIBPINYIN)(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit)
libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libsqlite3.so.0()(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4.11)(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4.14)(64bit) libuuid.so.1()(64bit) rtld(GNU_HASH)

suggestions:
1) Try not to hardcode the version in requires and buildrequires. Only if there
is strict dependency of any version then only mention that in spec.

2) If this package is not for RHEL then you can remove following
   a)removal of buildroot in %install
   b) %clean section
   c) %defattr(-,root,root,-)
3) A new macro has been introduced in latest changes in packaging guidelines.
See
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Why_the_.25makeinstall_macro_should_not_be_used

Use -> %make_install INSTALL="install -p"

above will also preserve timestamps.
APPROVED.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
[email protected]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

Reply via email to