https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830992
--- Comment #10 from Paul Moore <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #9) > What I mean is, is it LGPLv2(.1) "only", or "any later version"? LGPLv2.1 "only". > (In reply to comment #7) > > > Building should be verbose: > > > > Is this a requirement for acceptance? I ask because to make this change > > with the current release would either require changes upstream or a patch > > carried with the RPM. > > Whether or not it's a requirement, Ralf is right that it > makes debugging a whole lot easier. When all you have to go on > is a Koji logfile, you'll be grateful that you enabled as much > verbosity as possible. I've made it note of it for future upstream development efforts, but I just wanted to know if it was a requirement which would block the acceptance of the package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
