Il giorno mar 5 mar 2019 alle ore 14:40 Kaleb Keithley <[email protected]> ha scritto:
> Which version are you referring to? Where are you getting them from? > > I'm 99% certain all the packages on download.gluster.org are signed. (But > I might have missed signing a set; I'm human. :-)) > $ rpm --checksig --verbose https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/5/LATEST/Fedora/fedora-28/x86_64/glusterfs-5.4-1.fc28.x86_64.rpm https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/5/LATEST/Fedora/fedora-28/x86_64/glusterfs-5.4-1.fc28.x86_64.rpm : Header SHA256 digest: OK Header SHA1 digest: OK Payload SHA256 digest: OK MD5 digest: OK 5.4 for Fedora 28 is missing signature. The previous one in 5.3 used to work fine: rpm --checksig --verbose https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/5/5.3/Fedora/fedora-28/x86_64/glusterfs-5.3-1.fc28.x86_64.rpm https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/5/5.3/Fedora/fedora-28/x86_64/glusterfs-5.3-1.fc28.x86_64.rpm : Header V4 RSA/SHA256 Signature, key ID c2f8238c: OK Header SHA256 digest: OK Header SHA1 digest: OK Payload SHA256 digest: OK V4 RSA/SHA256 Signature, key ID c2f8238c: OK MD5 digest: OK > > On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 8:33 AM Sahina Bose <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> We are missing signed glusterfs rpms on Fedora 28. Could you help with >> this? >> >> thanks! >> sahina >> _______________________________________________ >> packaging mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging >> > -- SANDRO BONAZZOLA MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA R&D RHV Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/> [email protected] <https://red.ht/sig>
_______________________________________________ packaging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
