On 09/20/2012 04:53 AM, Jan Behrend wrote: > Hello List, > > we are evaluating packetfence as our NAC solution. Thanks for all the > great work. The problem I have is that the HP Procurve 2910al switch is > not officially supported. Is there a chance that this going to be the > case in the near future?
You want port-security or MAC-Auth / 802.1X? We have been recommending the latter lately. > > I test with the 2600 series. When the switch sends a trap this is what > I get in the packetfence log: > > │Use of uninitialized value in string eq at /usr/local/pf/sbin/pfsetvlan > line 603. If you reach pfsetvlan it means that the parser matches the trap and is almost supporting it but seems to be missing a few things (thus the warnings). Can you attach a few traps from the logs/snmptrapd.log file from that switch? I don't think the unrecognized one is the one we are after. Cheers! -- Olivier Bilodeau obilod...@inverse.ca :: +1.514.447.4918 *115 :: www.inverse.ca Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence (www.packetfence.org) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;258768047;13503038;j? http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html _______________________________________________ PacketFence-devel mailing list PacketFence-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-devel
