Hello Peter,

Rejected in Post auth mean that the authentication failed in PacketFence 
authorization.

The most likely issue with that (because Mac authentication ‘never' fail) 
points out to maybe a SNMP look up failing. Do you have the SNMP setting of 
that switch correctly config in PacketFence ?

Thanks,

Ludovic Zammit
Product Support Engineer Principal Lead

Cell: +1.613.670.8432
Akamai Technologies - Inverse
145 Broadway
Cambridge, MA 02142
Connect with Us:         <https://community.akamai.com/>  
<http://blogs.akamai.com/>  <https://twitter.com/akamai>  
<http://www.facebook.com/AkamaiTechnologies>  
<http://www.linkedin.com/company/akamai-technologies>  
<http://www.youtube.com/user/akamaitechnologies?feature=results_main>

> On Jan 10, 2023, at 2:05 PM, Truax, Peter via PacketFence-users 
> <packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> 
> Hi Everyone,
>  
> We upgraded from version 11.1 to 12.1 a few weeks ago and have experienced 
> strange behavior at times using Cisco 2960X switches. Wireless has been fine 
> as well as our legacy Dell switches.
>  
> At seemingly random days, we experience outages with random Cisco 2960X 
> switches. Radius logs show the following:
>  
> Jan  1 03:36:21 nac auth[1223977]: (247197) Rejected in post-auth: 
> [64167f000e86] (from client 10.10.0.38/32 port 60000 cli 64:16:7f:00:0e:86)
> Jan  1 03:36:21 nac auth[1223977]: (247197) Login incorrect (rest: Request 
> failed: 28 - Timeout was reached): [64167f000e86] (from client 10.10.0.38/32 
> port 60000 cli 64:16:7f:00:0e:86)
>  
> A reboot of the Packetfence Services fixes the problem temporarily. Thinking 
> this is a login problem, we have re-entered the radius passwords on both the 
> switch side and the Packetfence side with no changes in behavior.
>  
> Anyone else experience this behavior on 12.1.0?  Version 11.1 was rock solid 
> for us.
>  
> Regards,
>  
> Peter Truax
> Network Administrator
> (360) 688-2240
> Saint Martin’s University
> 5000 Abbey Way E
> Lacey, WA 98503
>  
> <image003.jpg>
>  
> _______________________________________________
> PacketFence-users mailing list
> PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net 
> <mailto:PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users__;!!GjvTz_vk!Uv0o0yr3kYP3-wafIKlDafSRX6zPh0erJrKNquSnQ3pabkIs3lffH1C9BTJdACOJHumbruOMux0NwiQLTXoKqWMY-zBAQNWeqV_Mig$
>  
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users__;!!GjvTz_vk!Uv0o0yr3kYP3-wafIKlDafSRX6zPh0erJrKNquSnQ3pabkIs3lffH1C9BTJdACOJHumbruOMux0NwiQLTXoKqWMY-zBAQNWeqV_Mig$>

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

Reply via email to