Happy Friday!

Using /usr/local/pf/bin/pftest authentication USERNAME  "", I can see that
the user is matching the deny rule as desired.

[image: image.png]

Here is a screenshot of the authentication.conf file. I think this contains
the relevant parts but let me know if I should send you the whole file.

[image: image.png]

Thanks!

On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 5:29 AM Zammit, Ludovic <luza...@akamai.com> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> You could use the command:
>
> /usr/local/pf/bin/pftest authentication USERNAME  ""
>
> You will see if you match properly your rule, it should bring
> Administration right.
>
> Could you show me your conf/authentication.conf?
>
> Thanks,
>
> *Ludovic Zammit*
> *Product Support Engineer Principal Lead*
> *Cell:* +1.613.670.8432
> Akamai Technologies - Inverse
> 145 Broadway
> Cambridge, MA 02142
> Connect with Us: <https://community.akamai.com> <http://blogs.akamai.com>
> <https://twitter.com/akamai> <http://www.facebook.com/AkamaiTechnologies>
> <http://www.linkedin.com/company/akamai-technologies>
> <http://www.youtube.com/user/akamaitechnologies?feature=results_main>
>
> On Apr 27, 2023, at 7:41 PM, IT Mercenary <theitmercena...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I'm hoping for some guidance on how to change the Radius Reply for CLI
> authentication when users are not a member of the specified group. The
> group is being matched as the RADIUS reply indicates the right
> administration rule is being matched (catch all).
>
> The behavior I was getting:
>
> <image.png>
>
> <image.png>
>
> Compared to what I'm getting now:
> <image.png>
>
> <image.png>
> Thanks!
>
> On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 6:45 AM IT Mercenary <theitmercena...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Ludovic,
>>
>> I've changed the group to use DN and equal, but I'm getting the same
>> results. Is there a way to customize the behavior when an administrative
>> user is authenticated but not authorized?
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 5:32 AM Zammit, Ludovic <luza...@akamai.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello there,
>>>
>>> It loos like the match regex operator does not work properly, in order
>>> to have a good match use the DistinguishName of the group object in the Ad
>>> in combinaison of the operator equals
>>>
>>> Memberof equals CN=MyGroup,OU=domain,OU=com
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *Ludovic Zammit*
>>> *Product Support Engineer Principal Lead*
>>> *Cell:* +1.613.670.8432
>>> Akamai Technologies - Inverse
>>> 145 Broadway
>>> Cambridge, MA 02142
>>> Connect with Us: <https://community.akamai.com/>
>>> <http://blogs.akamai.com/>
>>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://twitter.com/akamai__;!!GjvTz_vk!SF63EyrrM4FXLQkheVYp5dyTys9nEA_V0jNmoz16tIaS1t0BE9_KNqNryW2DCqpFdzzV9tBE1M5sU4Cqyf7_AxUp$>
>>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.facebook.com/AkamaiTechnologies__;!!GjvTz_vk!SF63EyrrM4FXLQkheVYp5dyTys9nEA_V0jNmoz16tIaS1t0BE9_KNqNryW2DCqpFdzzV9tBE1M5sU4CqyYr4gXNR$>
>>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.linkedin.com/company/akamai-technologies__;!!GjvTz_vk!SF63EyrrM4FXLQkheVYp5dyTys9nEA_V0jNmoz16tIaS1t0BE9_KNqNryW2DCqpFdzzV9tBE1M5sU4CqyUpLS561$>
>>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.youtube.com/user/akamaitechnologies?feature=results_main__;!!GjvTz_vk!SF63EyrrM4FXLQkheVYp5dyTys9nEA_V0jNmoz16tIaS1t0BE9_KNqNryW2DCqpFdzzV9tBE1M5sU4CqyVsZQVXE$>
>>>
>>> On Apr 21, 2023, at 1:45 PM, IT Mercenary via PacketFence-users <
>>> packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I have an administration rule for switch CLI access that is producing
>>> different results for users that are not a member of an AD group. Both
>>> switches are in a switch group with type based on the standard Cisco
>>> template. The desired result is being produced on appliance version 12.1.0
>>> and the undesired result on v12.2.0.
>>>
>>> *Administration Rules*
>>> <image.png>
>>>
>>> *v12.1.0 Results*
>>> <image.png>
>>> RADIUS Tab:
>>> <image.png>
>>>
>>> *v12.2.0 Results*
>>> <image.png>
>>>
>>> RADIUS Tab:
>>> <image.png>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> PacketFence-users mailing list
>>> PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>
>>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users__;!!GjvTz_vk!RJRooQcys6zdEdxUze4ob_Fdoh8f6vc2-IXTbp2iUXgzmcvH-3YEOBQRdtmbI7Lzb_CFnZNayskBCKtC7pOqRsEGTSZZOy4s7Q6HOQ$
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

Reply via email to