Steve,

make sure to have the followings ownerships and rights on /usr/local/pf/logs:
drwxr-xr-x  2 pf pf  4096 May 13 11:58 logs

and this on /usr/local/pf/logs/packetfence.log:
-rw-r--r-- 1 pf   pf   283760 May 17 16:34 packetfence.log

Regis Balzard
[email protected]  ::  +1.514.447.4918 (x110)  ::  www.inverse.ca
Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence 
(www.packetfence.org)


Stephen Wittstruck a écrit :
> Hello Regis, Olivier, et al,
> 
> BIND is working now thanks to Regis.
> 
> I think I have a PF server certificate error, due to PF reinstall maybe, 
> which I don't know how to fix.
> 
> Browsers on both PF and switch connecting PC's show the following browser 
> error (below) and I see this in /var/log/messages: "packetfence: error 
> getting update info: Peer certificate commonName does not match host, 
> expected packetfence.nac.mines.edu , go t packetfence"  PF's web admin 
> interface opens okay on the server, but nothing else it seems.
> 
> Here's the browser error:
> ---------
> Software error:
> 
> Can't open /usr/local/pf/logs/packetfence.log (Permission denied) at 
> /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/CGI/Carp.pm line 314.
> Compilation failed in require at /usr/local/pf/cgi-bin/redir.cgi line 15.
> BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/local/pf/cgi-bin/redir.cgi line 15.
> --------
> 
> Thank you!!
> Steve Wittstruck
> Colorado School of Mines
> ======
> On May 13, 2010, at 5:14 PM, Regis Balzard wrote:
> 
>> Hi Steve,
>>
>>
>> Steve Wittstruck a écrit :
>>> Oliver, et al:
>>>
>>> I figured out port 53 wasn't open in iptables.
>>>
>>> Also I remembered BIND was installed after Packetfence, maybe this is the 
>>> reason my BIND configuration isn't right.
>>>
>>> During server boot I noticed a message scroll by that says "locating 
>>> /var/named/chroot//etc/named.conf failed" - note the double backlash, i..e 
>>> '//', it was really in the message.  I couldn't find this error logged and 
>>> tried unsuccessfully to capture the error.  I didn't find any 'named' 
>>> /var/log/messages from this boot.
>>>
>>> Then I linked /etc/named.conf to /var/named/chroot/etc/named.conf, reloaded 
>>> named and got the following /var/log/messages:
>> remove it, you don't need that.
>>
>> edit /etc/sysconfig/named and make sure that ALL the lines are commented 
>> out, 
>> especially the last one (KEYTAB_FILE=...)
>>
>> start named and see if it works.
>> Keep me posted.
>>
>> Regis Balzard
>> [email protected]  ::  +1.514.447.4918 (x110)  ::  www.inverse.ca
>> Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence 
>> (www.packetfence.org)
>>
>>
>>
>>> May 13 16:27:38 packetfence named[4631]: starting BIND 
>>> 9.3.6-P1-RedHat-9.3.6-4.P1.el5_4.2
>>> May 13 16:27:38 packetfence named[4631]: adjusted limit on open files from 
>>> 1024 to 1048576
>>> May 13 16:27:38 packetfence named[4631]: found 4 CPUs, using 4 worker 
>>> threads
>>> May 13 16:27:38 packetfence named[4631]: using up to 4096 sockets
>>> May 13 16:27:38 packetfence named[4631]: loading configuration from 
>>> '/etc/named.conf'
>>> May 13 16:27:39 packetfence named[4631]: using default UDP/IPv4 port range: 
>>> [1024, 65535]
>>> May 13 16:27:39 packetfence named[4631]: using default UDP/IPv6 port range: 
>>> [1024, 65535]
>>> May 13 16:27:39 packetfence named[4631]: listening on IPv4 interface 
>>> eth1.53, 192.168.3.1#53
>>> May 13 16:27:39 packetfence named[4631]: listening on IPv4 interface 
>>> eth1.51, 192.168.2.1#53
>>> May 13 16:27:39 packetfence named[4631]: command channel listening on 
>>> 127.0.0.1#953
>>> May 13 16:27:39 packetfence named[4631]: couldn't open pid file 
>>> '/var/run/named/named.pid': Permission denied
>>> May 13 16:27:39 packetfence named[4631]: exiting (due to early fatal error)
>>>
>>> If I reboot with this configuration (the /etc/named.conf file linked to 
>>> /var/named/...) I get:
>>> May 13 16:33:58 packetfence named: zone ./IN: loading master file 
>>> named-registration.ca: file not found
>>> May 13 16:33:58 packetfence named: registration/./IN: file not found
>>> May 13 16:33:58 packetfence named: zone ./IN: loading master file 
>>> named-isolation.ca: file not found
>>> May 13 16:33:58 packetfence named: isolation/./IN: file not found
>>>
>>> Is there any hope of getting this system set right?
>>>
>>> Thanks again!
>>> Steve Wittstruck
>>> Colorado School of Mines
>>> ________________________________________
>>> From: Olivier Bilodeau [[email protected]]
>>> Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2010 9:12 AM
>>> To: [email protected]
>>> Subject: Re: [Packetfence-users] DNS issues in registration VLAN (WAS: no 
>>> 1.8.8 snmptraps from Cisco 3750?)
>>>
>>> Hi Steve,
>>>
>>> Steve Wittstruck wrote:
>>>> Hi Olivier,
>>>>
>>>> Sorry for the delay.
>>>>
>>>> Yes, I did follow the installation guide for setting up the 3 DNS files: 
>>>> /etc/named.conf, /var/named/named-registration.ca, and 
>>>> /var/named/named-isolation.ca.  I just reviewed all 3 and the only 
>>>> difference from the installation guide was 'admin.nac.mines.edu' in both 
>>>> SOA entries.
>>>>
>>>> Is there anything else I can check?
>>> The goal for DHCP / DNS in the registration and isolation VLANs is the
>>> following:
>>>
>>> - PacketFence is the only one who serves DHCP and DNS in that VLAN
>>> - The DHCP is configured to give an IP in a new subnet and with
>>> following options:
>>>   - DNS Server is the PacketFence IP in that VLAN
>>>   - Default gateway is the PacketFence IP in that VLAN
>>> - The DNS is configured to ALWAYS return PacketFence's IP no matter what
>>> the question was
>>>
>>> This way, PacketFence's web server gets the HTTP request and we use a
>>> rewrite rule to rewrite the URL to something that is more meaningful to
>>> a user and present the captive portal.
>>>
>>> I'll need you to doublecheck that each required step in accomplished in
>>> the right way. One good way to do that is to put a PC in such a VLAN and
>>> validate DHCP first then network reachability, routing (if any), DNS, etc.
>>>
>>> If you want your problem solved quickly (you are under time
>>> constraints), you can always pay for support and we will log into your
>>> setup, diagnose what's wrong and suggest fix. Otherwise keep posting
>>> your progress and the community will troubleshoot you on the mailing
>>> list for free.
>>>
>>> Have a nice day!
>>> --
>>> Olivier Bilodeau
>>> [email protected]  ::  +1.514.447.4918 *115  ::  www.inverse.ca
>>> Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.scalableogo.org) and
>>> PacketFence (www.packetfence.org)
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Packetfence-users mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Packetfence-users mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Packetfence-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Packetfence-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Packetfence-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

Reply via email to