Hi Doc, Doc Phillips wrote: > Greetings to all, > > Has anyone had success implementing PacketFence in an environment > utilizing just Enterasys hardware? I would like to implement a NAC > solution without the added costs and extensive restructuring of our > current network. Can anyone share their story of implementing PF into > such an environment, whether good or bad? We're currently using N > series for the backbone, C series at the edge, and RBT's for our > wireless AP's.
We developed support for the N3, D2, C2 and C3. I was personally involved with a deployment in the United States for a K12 using Enterasys and it went well and smoothly. Not sure what an RBT is however. > > Also, I see FreeRadius is supported but can Microsoft's IAS be used for > radius authentication? PacketFence version 1.9.0 relies on a perl script installed in freeradius that does some requests against the packetfence database. I guess someone *could* rewrite the script in a language that is supported by IAS but since freeradius is free and open source I wouldn't recommend that. Usually the freeradius is installed on the PacketFence server so no need for extra hardware or added complexity. You could use your IAS to proxy the requests to the freeradius server but I don't see the benefit of doing that. I hope I answered to some of your concerns. Thanks, -- Olivier Bilodeau [email protected] :: +1.514.447.4918 *115 :: www.inverse.ca Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence (www.packetfence.org) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Make an app they can't live without Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Packetfence-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
