Rebooting the box fixed the issue. I am not sure why that worked but it did.
Thanks, _ /-\ ndrew On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Francois Gaudreault <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > Don't forget to add the trigger section into your violation definition with > the proper Detect::[SNORT_SID] statement. Otherwise, PacketFence will not > take any actions. > > I took the opportunity to update the Administration Guide to reflect that. > See the page 88 of the attached pdf. > > Have a good one! > > On 10-10-15 10:05 AM, Andrew Niemantsverdriet wrote: >> >> I have enabled snort and looking at the pf.log file I can see >> violations that are happening how ever packetfence takes no action >> (like moving the offender into the isolation vlan). Why is this, and >> how can I fix it? >> >> Thanks, > > -- > Francois Gaudreault > [email protected] :: +1.514.447.4918 :: www.inverse.ca > Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence > (www.packetfence.org) > > -- _ /-\ ndrew Niemantsverdriet Academic Computing (406) 238-7360 Rocky Mountain College 1511 Poly Dr. Billings MT, 59102 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download new Adobe(R) Flash(R) Builder(TM) 4 The new Adobe(R) Flex(R) 4 and Flash(R) Builder(TM) 4 (formerly Flex(R) Builder(TM)) enable the development of rich applications that run across multiple browsers and platforms. Download your free trials today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/adobe-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Packetfence-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
