I am working on setting up PacketFence in a test environment and most of it is 
running smoothly and working very well. I am currently having an issue where 
the user machine that I am using to test with is Ubuntu 10.04 and there seems 
to be some setting in Ubuntu (maybe Linux in general I haven't tried any other 
distros yet) where it delays for about 5 seconds before the network interface 
registers as down after it has been unplugged or the interface is shutdown. My 
guess is it does that so if there is a slight hiccup in the link it doesn't 
lose its connection. 

The problem is it causes the connection to not be reset when PacketFence flips 
the vlan and admin status of the port. Looking at the logs in packetfence and 
the switch, it is actually shutting down the port and bringing it back up. 
Ubuntu though, is not showing the interface as down so I have to manually reset 
the interface on Ubuntu to get an IP address on the newly set vlan. I tried a 
Windows 7 machine and it worked fine because it immediately registers the 
interface as being down. 

Has anyone else run into this issue? Would there be a way to program in a delay 
between the admin status down and up SNMP writes to the switch so it would 
leave the port down for some set amount of seconds? Thanks for any help.



NATE RENBARGER 
NETWORK ADMINISTRATOR, UNIVERSITY INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

INDIANA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY
4201 S. WASHINGTON ST.
MARION, IN 46953

765.677.2340   |   765.677.2020 FAX 
[email protected]

INDWES.EDU/IT


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE:
Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen.
Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle.
Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb
_______________________________________________
Packetfence-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

Reply via email to