That is exactly what I needed to know. Thanks so much for your prompt and
detailed response.
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 8:56 AM, Francois Gaudreault
<[email protected]>wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Maybe I spoke too fast. Maybe there is a way to do it without using
> violations. In fact, you can probably use the
> pf::vlan::shouldAutoRegister() method.
>
> You might want to have a look into /usr/local/pf/lib/pf/vlan.pm. You
> could probably override this method in pf::vlan:custom with your own code.
>
> The only "problem" is that with this method, the host would need to be
> detected using the dhcp listeners prior receiving the first security
> SNMP trap. Otherwise, the autoreg would work only at the second time
> the user is seen. (ie. user plugs on a port, security trap is received,
> but it will not be autoreg. If the user change port some time after,
> the device would be autoreg)
>
> Let me know if you need more info.
>
> --
> Francois Gaudreault, ing. jr
> [email protected] :: +1.514.447.4918 (x130) :: www.inverse.ca
> Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence (
> www.packetfence.org)
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
> A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
> for your organization - today and in the future.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d
> _______________________________________________
> Packetfence-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
for your organization - today and in the future.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d
_______________________________________________
Packetfence-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
