Hello David, Ok, first thing to check is your ip definition in networks.conf ( under /usr/local/pf/conf ) , PF will regenerate any dhcpd settings based on the info included in this file every time you will restart PF daemon. Then, adjust your ip in your named template to answers correctly your dns request... ( /usr/local/pf/conf/template/ files: named-isolation.ca and named-registration.ca, validate the ip there to reflect yours... )
From that point, you should be good to restart PF and validate that the DHCPD daemon is now listening on your isolation and registration network interface correctly... ( /etc/init.d/packetfence restart or service packetfence restart ) points to keep in mind: - PF come with the latest stable version of dhcpd and named, no needs to configure or install these daemons included in your Linux distribution... - make it work before adding more security to it : disable iptables for testing, re-enable it when you'll be ready for your final tests... Regards, M-A Le 11-03-15 10:19, Palmer, David W. a écrit : > > Hello All, > > I am currently working on testing packetfence vs several commercial > NAC solutions. However, I am having an issue getting DHCPD to start. I > receive this error: > > **************************************************************** > > No subnet declaration for eth0 (172.28.4.74). > > ** Ignoring requests on eth0. If this is not what > > you want, please write a subnet declaration > > in your dhcpd.conf file for the network segment > > to which interface eth0 is attached. ** > > Not configured to listen on any interfaces! > > **************************************************************** > > What I have gathered is that I need to configure my registration > (10.28.4.0) and isolation (10.28.5.0) subnets inside of my dhcpd.conf > file. What I am wondering is if I do this inside of the > /etc/dhcpd.conf or is there a template inside of the pf directory? > What should the subnet configuration look like? > > Thank you, > > David > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Colocation vs. Managed Hosting > A question and answer guide to determining the best fit > for your organization - today and in the future. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d > > > _______________________________________________ > Packetfence-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users -- Marc-Andre Jutras, Project manager - Inverse inc. [email protected] :: +1.514.447.4918 (x110) :: http://www.inverse.ca Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence (www.packetfence.org) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Colocation vs. Managed Hosting A question and answer guide to determining the best fit for your organization - today and in the future. http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d _______________________________________________ Packetfence-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
