On 11/01/11 1:41 PM, Ritter, Nicholas wrote: > Are the situations when PF v2 would not update counters on the dashboard? > > I noticed that the Active and Inactive Nodes in the “Current Activity” > section do not seem to reflect the reality. Are there implementation > scenarios where this would happen? I am using a Cisco 2960 switch with > mac-address learning traps enabled. I am not currently using the > port-security method of implementation. > > I have a registered node that is active and PF v2 is changing the VLAN > in the correct manner, but the “Active Registered Nodes” counter is not > incrementing. The “Inactive nodes” in “Current Activity” does increment. >
Is the DHCP traffic from your production VLANs reaching the PacketFence server with a pfdhcplistener daemon listening on it? Active / inactive is a legacy from the time where PacketFence was only inline (ARP / DHCP modes). It would need some love to be accurate again as no explicit inactivity detection has been developed for the VLAN isolation mode. -- Olivier Bilodeau [email protected] :: +1.514.447.4918 *115 :: www.inverse.ca Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence (www.packetfence.org) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ WhatsUp Gold - Download Free Network Management Software The most intuitive, comprehensive, and cost-effective network management toolset available today. Delivers lowest initial acquisition cost and overall TCO of any competing solution. http://p.sf.net/sfu/whatsupgold-sd _______________________________________________ Packetfence-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
