Hi,

Is there a reason why you are using PF 1.6.2, the current version is 
2.2.1.  I believe something changed with the RPM package.  Do a search 
on the system to see if the file is somewhere else, or use yum 
whatprovides command to check in which package the file is contained.

On 11-07-05 1:22 PM, Luckmore Chirongo wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'm running PacketFence 1.6.2 on Centos 4 and if I attempt to start PF, I get 
> the error "Unable to initialize rule: dlopen() failed: 
> /usr/lib/IPTables-IPv4/ipt_pl_MARK.so: cannot open shared object file: No 
> such file or directory.
>
> I have perl-IPTables-IPv4-0.98-1.el4.rf.i386.rpm installed and if I check in 
> /usr/lib there is no IPTables-IPv4 directory.
>
> Please assist, and thanks in advance.
>
> Luckmore Chirongo
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
> Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security
> threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
> sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2
> _______________________________________________
> Packetfence-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>


-- 
Francois Gaudreault, ing. jr
[email protected]  ::  +1.514.447.4918 (x130) ::  www.inverse.ca
Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence 
(www.packetfence.org)


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security 
threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes 
sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2
_______________________________________________
Packetfence-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

Reply via email to