> I have commented on the tracking... comma seperated dns servers seems to 
> be the cause of iptables not blocking the traffic.  With one dns entered 
> in pf.conf and in network.conf for DHCP everything is detected and filtered.

This is fixed now.

> 
> I am running snort and intended it to monitor the inline interface, 
> unless I have the interface naming confused.  I have this dedicated box 
> setup to create a seperate net which can be monitored.  So I have eth0 
> as part of my main network, and am using eth1 as a NAT to uncontrolled 
> devices (in this case student laptops).

I just made changes to make sure that snort can run on the inline
interface correctly. It will be available as a snapshot or in the devel
repo tomorrow.

Assuming:
LAN ---> eth1:PacketFence:eth0 ---> Internet

You should have:
[interface eth0]
...
type=management

[interface eth1]
...
type=internal,monitor
enforcement=inline

It worked in the lab.

-- 
Olivier Bilodeau
[email protected]  ::  +1.514.447.4918 *115  ::  www.inverse.ca
Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence
(www.packetfence.org)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
definitive record of customers, application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1
_______________________________________________
Packetfence-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

Reply via email to