> > I tested with 2 users on Xp client (flat file) and tested on > packetfence these commands: > > #tail -f /usr/local/pf/logs/packetefence.log ( just got IP requests ) > > #tcpdump -i eth0 port 162 > > Did not receive any traps. On the switch side I put >> debug snmp packets, and before these modifications I was getting at least >> messages (send / response) > On the interface web no modifications too, the same happens before > modifications. > > > Should I do some modification on my running-config ? > What steps could I perform to ensure that I will receive SNMP traps ? > Please really need help about this... > > > My running-config is bellow: [...]
Did you resolve your issue? If so share the answer. If not: You are running dot1x along side port-security: not recommended You have linkup / linkdown traps although Francois told you to get rid of the statement. You have MAC-Notif traps although Francois told you to get rid of the statement. That said, this means you should be getting too many traps and not none of them. So start from the beginning: - can the switch ping packetfence's IP on eth0 - validate the firewall rules / ACL in the path and on PF (don't forget it's port 162 UDP) - if all else fails, on your switch: debug snmp packets, generate the events then, show log Good luck! -- Olivier Bilodeau [email protected] :: +1.514.447.4918 *115 :: www.inverse.ca Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence (www.packetfence.org) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The demand for IT networking professionals continues to grow, and the demand for specialized networking skills is growing even more rapidly. Take a complimentary Learning@Cisco Self-Assessment and learn about Cisco certifications, training, and career opportunities. http://p.sf.net/sfu/cisco-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Packetfence-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
