I'm sorry for the probably-dumb question but I am just not seeing that
anywhere on the website, that the host must be running Linux. I thought I
could use VMWare Workstation installed on a Windows 7 host, and run CentOS
6 (with PF installed) in VMWare? Should I have CentOS 6 as my host OS too
or does it matter what Linux distribution I use?
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 12:25:30 -0400
> From: Francois Gaudreault <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Packetfence-users] PF in a virtual environment/only 1
> NIC on server (Packetfence-users Digest, Vol 47, Issue 16)
> To: [email protected]
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Hi,
>
> I never really tested it, but so far I only saw it working on Linux.
> It's also clearly stated in the documentation/download page.
>
> Thanks.
>
> On 12-03-14 9:08 AM, Stephanie Arce wrote:
> > Ah sorry, I am using VMWare Workstation 7 with Windows 7 on my host PC.
> > Should that not pose a problem either? Thank you so much!
> >
> >
> > Today's Topics:
> >
> > 1. PF in a virtual environment/only 1 NIC on server (Stephanie
> Arce)
> > 2. Problem reaching the web interface for PF ZEN (Ian Stewart)
> > 3. Re: Problem reaching the web interface for PF ZEN (Mark Holmes)
> > 4. Re: PF in a virtual environment/only 1 NIC on server (Mark
> Holmes)
> > 5. Re: PF in a virtual environment/only 1 NIC on server
> > (Francois Gaudreault)
> > 6. Packetfence v3.2 and Cisco 6500 port-security problem -
> VLAN
> > ACCESS (Thomas Tsai)
> >
> >
> >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 1
> > Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 19:45:51 -0400
> > From: Stephanie Arce <[email protected]
> > <mailto:[email protected]>>
> > Subject: [Packetfence-users] PF in a virtual environment/only 1 NIC
> on
> > server
> > To: [email protected]
> > <mailto:[email protected]>
> > Message-ID:
> > <CAAmN22Be+ntr03vOqixDAvpehFKnMgvocTK8E+AtLZYn6HL0=a...@mail.gmail.com
> > <mailto:[email protected]>>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> >
> > Hello, I am currently trying to set up PacketFence with VLAN
> > registration
> > for testing in VMWare. My host PC only has 1 NIC, but in VMWare I
> have 4
> > NICs set up. I have multiple physical PCs I can use as clients, and
> > a Cisco
> > Catalyst 2960 switch. Earlier today I connected my PF/host PC to the
> > switch
> > but got confused when setting up port security on the interfaces - I
> > think
> > I would have to make the interface from the switch to PF a trunk,
> > and then
> > my interfaces from the switch to clients access with all the port
> > security
> > settings configured. Does that sound like it should work?
> >
> > I had this set up earlier and I was not receiving any packets on my
> > client,
> > but then again I didn't have a DHCP helper-address on the switch so
> > maybe
> > that's what was wrong. I am trying to follow the "Configuration by
> > Example"
> > section in the administration guide on page 36.
> >
> > Thank you for any help!
> > -------------- next part --------------
> > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 4
> > Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 08:31:32 +0000
> > From: Mark Holmes <[email protected]
> > <mailto:[email protected]>>
> > Subject: Re: [Packetfence-users] PF in a virtual environment/only 1
> > NIC on server
> > To: "[email protected]
> > <mailto:[email protected]>"
> > <[email protected]
> > <mailto:[email protected]>>
> > Message-ID: <[email protected]
> > <mailto:[email protected]>>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> >
> > That sounds right to me - you'll need to configure VLAN's on the
> > card in the VMWare box and create your registration, isolation etc
> > networks on there, connecting each one to a virtual NIC on the PF
> box.
> >
> > Mark
> >
> > Sent on the move
> >
> > On 13 Mar 2012, at 23:55, "Stephanie Arce"
> > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hello, I am currently trying to set up PacketFence with VLAN
> > registration for testing in VMWare. My host PC only has 1 NIC, but
> > in VMWare I have 4 NICs set up. I have multiple physical PCs I can
> > use as clients, and a Cisco Catalyst 2960 switch. Earlier today I
> > connected my PF/host PC to the switch but got confused when setting
> > up port security on the interfaces - I think I would have to make
> > the interface from the switch to PF a trunk, and then my interfaces
> > from the switch to clients access with all the port security
> > settings configured. Does that sound like it should work?
> > >
> > > I had this set up earlier and I was not receiving any packets on
> > my client, but then again I didn't have a DHCP helper-address on the
> > switch so maybe that's what was wrong. I am trying to follow the
> > "Configuration by Example" section in the administration guide on
> > page 36.
> > >
> > > Thank you for any help!
> > >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow!
> > > The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft
> > developers
> > > is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5,
> > CSS3, MVC3,
> > > Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe
> now!
> > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Packetfence-users mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > <mailto:[email protected]>
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
> >
> > Nuffield College is a Registered Charity No. 1137506. Registered
> > Office: Nuffield College, New Road, Oxford, OX1 1NF
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 5
> > Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 08:32:07 -0400
> > From: Francois Gaudreault <[email protected]
> > <mailto:[email protected]>>
> > Subject: Re: [Packetfence-users] PF in a virtual environment/only 1
> > NIC on server
> > To: [email protected]
> > <mailto:[email protected]>
> > Message-ID: <[email protected]
> > <mailto:[email protected]>>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I assume you are using VMWare Player on Linux. You will need to do a
> > trunk port on your switch with the management as the native VLAN.
> Then,
> > in the VM itself, everything should be there.
> >
> > You don't need to configure VLAN interface on the host PC itself
> anymore
> > since Player deals better with the VLAN tags.
> >
> > On 12-03-14 4:31 AM, Mark Holmes wrote:
> > > That sounds right to me - you'll need to configure VLAN's on the
> > card in the VMWare box and create your registration, isolation etc
> > networks on there, connecting each one to a virtual NIC on the PF
> box.
> > >
> > > Mark
> > >
> > > Sent on the move
> > >
> > > On 13 Mar 2012, at 23:55, "Stephanie
> > Arce"<[email protected]
> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hello, I am currently trying to set up PacketFence with VLAN
> > registration for testing in VMWare. My host PC only has 1 NIC, but
> > in VMWare I have 4 NICs set up. I have multiple physical PCs I can
> > use as clients, and a Cisco Catalyst 2960 switch. Earlier today I
> > connected my PF/host PC to the switch but got confused when setting
> > up port security on the interfaces - I think I would have to make
> > the interface from the switch to PF a trunk, and then my interfaces
> > from the switch to clients access with all the port security
> > settings configured. Does that sound like it should work?
> > >>
> > >> I had this set up earlier and I was not receiving any packets on
> > my client, but then again I didn't have a DHCP helper-address on the
> > switch so maybe that's what was wrong. I am trying to follow the
> > "Configuration by Example" section in the administration guide on
> > page 36.
> > >>
> > >> Thank you for any help!
> >
> >
> >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Virtualization& Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning
> > Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing
> > also focuses on allowing computing to be delivered as a service.
> > http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51521223/
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Packetfence-users mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>
>
> --
> Francois Gaudreault, ing. jr
> [email protected] :: +1.514.447.4918 (x130) :: www.inverse.ca
> Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence
> (www.packetfence.org)
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Virtualization & Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning
> Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing
> also focuses on allowing computing to be delivered as a service.
> http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51521223/
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Packetfence-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>
>
> End of Packetfence-users Digest, Vol 47, Issue 19
> *************************************************
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Virtualization & Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning
Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing
also focuses on allowing computing to be delivered as a service.
http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51521223/
_______________________________________________
Packetfence-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
