>
> Community, can you look at your snort output and decide whether it would
> be better to use the ruleset name convention ({ET,GPL,VRT} Something) or
> the classification? I'm not familiar enough with snort rules to know if
> classification strings can be relied upon.
>
> This would be quite an improvement regarding our snort integration and I
> would like feedback early please!
>
Quick FYI
I just opened a feature request in our tracker:
http://packetfence.org/bugs/view.php?id=1440
Discussion [or lack thereof] should still happen on the list.
--
Olivier Bilodeau
[email protected] :: +1.514.447.4918 *115 :: www.inverse.ca
Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence
(www.packetfence.org)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
