Hi Dan, Yes. We are not even using those if you installed the packetfence-freeradius2 package.
On 12-07-03 10:31 AM, Dan Nelson wrote: > so just to be clear in the sites-enabled I remarked out the perl and put > packetfence in its place. I did that on default in the 2 places and then > got an error about the inner-tunnel so I remarked the perl in the > post-auth and put packetfence there. > > Is that correct? > > Thanks > > Dan Nelson > > *Nutraceutical Corporation* > > Network Administrator > > 801-334-3702 > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Live Security Virtual Conference > Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and > threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions > will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware > threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ > > > > _______________________________________________ > PacketFence-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users -- Francois Gaudreault, ing. jr [email protected] :: +1.514.447.4918 (x130) :: www.inverse.ca Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence (www.packetfence.org) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ PacketFence-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
