Hi Romer,

 

I use VMWare, but I would bet that Xen has a similar feature set.  For my
case, there were two ways to deal with the VLAN traffic:

 

Option 1: Have your hypervisor deal with the VLAN traffic 

-          Set up one virtual switch for each interface, and configure that
virtual switch to accept the desired traffic.  

-          In your case, you would have 7 Virtual switches and 7 Virtual
network adapters on your PF Virtual Machine.  This allows the hypervisor (in
my case VMWare, in your case Xen) to deal with all the VLAN tags so the
operating system hosted on your VM doesn't have to worry about it.  

 

Option 2: Have your VM Operating System deal with the VLAN traffic (This is
the way I chose.)

-          Set up a single VLAN switch on VLAN 4096 (the equivalent of a
broadcast address.  This will forward all VLAN traffic - VLAN tags included
- to an attached virtual interface).

-          Configure your OS to deal with the VM traffic.  For my
PacketFence box, this meant creating VLAN interfaces.  In Centos, this means
calling the interface by the naming convention ethx.y where X = the
interface number and Y=the VLAN you want to receive.

-          In my case, I have eth0.1, eth0.10, eth0.20, eth0.30

 

With either of those two options, you can decide how to divvy up physical
network interfaces to fill your bandwidth and redundancy needs.

 

 

From: Romer Ventura [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2012 11:03 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [PacketFence-users] Noob questions - PF and XenServer

 

Hello,

 

I am interested on implementing PF 3.4 in my environment and I have a
question I cant seem to find the answer to in the docs.

 

First, let me give an overview of my environment:

-          VLAN1 (default vlan): has all the legacy stuff and printers.

-          VLAN10 is for employees of type 1

-          VLAN20 is for employees of type 2

-          VLAN30 is for employees of type 3

-          VLAN40 is for guest

-          VLAN50 is for all virtual servers

-          VLAN100 if for all physical servers and routers

 

I would be running PF in a VM under XenServer. I use Debian and PF 3.4 has
already been installed. My main question is: Do I need a Network Interface
for each of my VLANs or can I just have 1 interface and do everything from
there.?

 

I also have 2 DHCP and 2 DNS servers running in Windows server 2008 and
would like to stick with them to handle the DHCP replies and DNS records,
Does PF only uses its DHCP and DNS for the guest assignment or does it use
it for ALL clients?

 

Thanks.


DoubleCheck identified this as CLEAN. Give feedback:
<http://dcem.cccp.com/ms?k=AIPKD0RQGJN-> This is SPAM .
<http://dcem.cccp.com/md?k=AIPKD0RQGJN-> More 

 

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

Reply via email to