On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 10:40:17AM +0200, Primož Marinšek wrote: > I've installed PF running on VirtualBox thinking "what could go wrong", > but I found out soon enough that VLANs are the problem. I've been > reading of some workarounds for this, but it seem a waste of time for > this. > Is VMware Player any better that VirtualBox at this or is the ESXi the > only solution for this? > I just want to run PF on my ubuntu to give it a try with our WLAN > network.
If the virtualisation host is running Linux, you can use KVM. Otherwise: create virtual interfaces eth0, eth1, eth2 for the PF guest VM. Then ideally you would bridge those to VLAN subinterfaces on the VM host, but if that doesn't work, at worst you can bridge them to separate physical interfaces (plug in some USB-ethernet adapters if necessary) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct _______________________________________________ PacketFence-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
