Hi Jan,
> I found a little more information: This is the relevant code in
> lib/pf/scan.pm:
>
> line 254:
> # Start the scan
> my $failed_scan = $scan->startScan();
> ### by jan
> # $failed_scan = '0';
>
> # Hum ... somethings wrong in the scan ?
> if ( $failed_scan ) {
> my $cmd = $bin_dir . "/pfcmd manage vclose $host_mac $SCAN_VID";
> $logger->info("TOO EARLY 2: Calling $cmd because failed_scan =
> $failed_scan");
> my $grace = pf_run("$cmd");
> # FIXME shouldn't we focus on return code instead of output?
> pretty sure this is broken
> if ( $grace == -1 ) {
> $logger->warn("Problem trying to close scan violation");
> }
> }
>
> For some reason calling the start scan command reurns '1'. If I set
> failed_scan = 0 all is well with scan report parsing and adding follow
> up violations ... not the right way to approach the fix to the problem,
> though ;-)
Can you open a bug in our BTS (http://www.packetfence.org/bugs/) with
your findings? It's clearly something we need to look at!
Thanks!
--
Francois Gaudreault, ing. jr
[email protected] :: +1.514.447.4918 (x130) :: www.inverse.ca
Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence
(www.packetfence.org)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Windows 8 Center - In partnership with Sourceforge
Your idea - your app - 30 days.
Get started!
http://windows8center.sourceforge.net/
what-html-developers-need-to-know-about-coding-windows-8-metro-style-apps/
_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
