Don Greer wrote: > Ok, here’s something that’s going to become an issue for me on deployment. > We have multiple sites and each site has its own management network. > It appears that PF assumes that all managed machines live on a single > network off the management vlan. Is it possible to change this, or do > we have to setup some sort of remote PF installation at each location? > That latter options is going to meet with some serious resistance at > some of our sites (they are really bad environments and we have no > provisions for servers at them), so I’m hoping there’s a way to tell PF > that Network X.X.X.X and Y.Y.Y.Y and Z.Z.Z.Z are all “management” networks.
I'm pretty sure that the only management network PF cares about is the one it's on locally. I have switches all over the place and never told PF anything about those networks other than identifying the switch IP. > Don -- --------------------------- Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold [email protected] --------------------------- "Any sufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology.\" - Niven's Inverse of Clarke's Third Law ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev _______________________________________________ PacketFence-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
