Will need more that that to figure out what is happening…
Please send packetfence.log for that timeframe cause it is PacketFence that is 
returning a reject to FreeRADIUS...

Cheers!
dw.

--
[email protected] :: +1.514.447.4918 (x110) :: www.inverse.ca
Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence 
(www.packetfence.org)

On 2013-06-20, at 5:36 PM, Brian Lucas <[email protected]> wrote:

> This is the result of running radiusd -X -d /usr/local/pf/raddb/
> 
> http://pastebin.com/Whk6HuTm
> 
> Also my radius.log is spammed with: 
> 
> Thu Jun 20 10:17:08 2013 : Auth: Login OK: [e0f847173348] (from client 
> 172.16.0.24 port 988 cli e0f8.4717.3348)
> Thu Jun 20 10:17:12 2013 : Auth: Login OK: [e0f847173348] (from client 
> 172.16.0.24 port 989 cli e0f8.4717.3348)
> Thu Jun 20 10:17:16 2013 : Auth: Login OK: [e0f847173348] (from client 
> 172.16.0.24 port 990 cli e0f8.4717.3348)
> Thu Jun 20 10:17:20 2013 : Auth: Login OK: [e0f847173348] (from client 
> 172.16.0.24 port 991 cli e0f8.4717.3348)
> Thu Jun 20 10:17:24 2013 : Auth: Login OK: [e0f847173348] (from client 
> 172.16.0.24 port 992 cli e0f8.4717.3348)
> Thu Jun 20 10:17:25 2013 : Auth: Login OK: [2c4401c76f59] (from client 
> 172.16.0.24 port 993 cli 2c44.01c7.6f59)
> 
> constantly but the device (in this case a mac book pro) never receives an IP 
> address.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
> 
> Build for Windows Store.
> 
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev_______________________________________________
> PacketFence-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:

Build for Windows Store.

http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

Reply via email to