Tim
> I've actually trashed that install at this point and gone back to 4.01 for
> the moment. I did notice this when I started with 4.x, so I'm expecting to
> see it again when I get some data in the db.
> I did try different date ranges, using the provided presets ( Today, 7 days,
> etc).
Allright, keep us posted.
> Hmmm, on a separate note – so if Nodes isn't populating, it's because we're
> not seeing the DHCP traffic, yes?
Nodes is populating by DHCP traffic and by connections (FreeRADIUS, portal)
Cheers!
dw.
--
[email protected] :: +1.514.447.4918 (x110) :: www.inverse.ca
Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence
(www.packetfence.org)
On 2013-06-21, at 5:58 PM, "Palmer, Tim" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Derek,
>
> I've actually trashed that install at this point and gone back to 4.01 for
> the moment. I did notice this when I started with 4.x, so I'm expecting to
> see it again when I get some data in the db.
> I did try different date ranges, using the provided presets ( Today, 7 days,
> etc).
>
> Hmmm, on a separate note – so if Nodes isn't populating, it's because we're
> not seeing the DHCP traffic, yes?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Tim Palmer
>
> From: Derek Wuelfrath <[email protected]>
> Reply-To: <[email protected]>
> Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 16:22:22 -0400
> To: <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] Dashboard inaccurate
>
> Tim,
> Can you double check that there is no date/time filter on the status page ?
>
> Also, the node page is populated based on DHCP request/offer that PacketFence
> is seeing and the dashboard actually use real node that have hitten the
> portal or used RADIUS to authenticate.
>
> Cheers!
> dw.
>
> --
> [email protected] :: +1.514.447.4918 (x110) :: www.inverse.ca
> Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence
> (www.packetfence.org)
>
> On 2013-06-18, at 3:35 PM, "Palmer, Tim" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Good day all,
>>
>> I don't know if this is just cosmetic, but on my Dashboard screen
>> (4.0.2-0.20130610.el6), the display is generally not accurate.
>>
>> For instance, at the minute, it shows no registered nodes, no unregistered
>> nodes and 10 new nodes. My nodes screen has 13 rows – 2 registered and 11
>> unregistered.
>>
>> I've noticed this since I started with 4.0, but had bigger things to work
>> on.
>>
>> Is this expected/known ?
>>
>> Thank you for your time,
>>
>> Tim
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
>>
>> Build for Windows Store.
>>
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev_______________________________________________
>> PacketFence-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev_______________________________________________
> PacketFence-users mailing list [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
>
> Build for Windows Store.
>
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev_______________________________________________
> PacketFence-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
Build for Windows Store.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
