Do I have to forward the dhcp requests to packet fence or can I use the
auto register feature?
On Jun 29, 2013 3:01 PM, "Fabrice Durand" <[email protected]> wrote:

>  Hello Dustin,
> it could be done with the github branch
> https://github.com/inverse-inc/packetfence/tree/feature/iplog_accounting
>
> In fact you will use accounting information to fill out your database
> (probably have to add a function to add the device if it doesn't exist in
> the database) , declare your switch in the conf to as a production switch
> with all the parameter to interact with it and don't forget to forward the
> dhcp traffic to packetfence.
>
> With that way you will have a database with all your devices and where
> they are and will have the possibility to put them in the isolation vlan if
> you trigger manually a violation or automatically (snort, suricata,
> accounting violation ...)
>
> And of course it could be sponsored development.
>
> Regards
> Fabrice
>
>
> Le 2013-06-29 14:05, Dustin Schuemann a écrit :
>
> This can't be done just with the SNMP notifications. What I want to do is
> have a database of all the devices. If a device needs to be in the
> isolation vlan I would put it in there and then when the device is plugged
> in packet fence would set the vlan for that switch interface.
> On Jun 29, 2013 1:56 PM, "Fabrice Durand" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>  Hello,
>> you mean without registration process and with an ids like snort ?
>>
>> If it that case, packetfence must have to know where the device is
>> (switch interface) and forward the dhcp traffic to packetfence to be able
>> for it to resolv mac by ip.
>> If you do that , it's possible.
>>
>>
>> Regards
>> Fabrice
>> Le 2013-06-29 13:26, Dustin Schuemann a écrit :
>>
>> Can packetfence use one interface? I only want to do vlan isolation with
>> MAC traps. Is this possible?
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
>>
>> Build for Windows Store.
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> PacketFence-users mailing 
>> [email protected]https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
>>
>> Build for Windows Store.
>>
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
>> _______________________________________________
>> PacketFence-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>>
>>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
>
> Build for Windows Store.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PacketFence-users mailing 
> [email protected]https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
>
> Build for Windows Store.
>
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> PacketFence-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:

Build for Windows Store.

http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

Reply via email to