> I made another post about this and am hoping for a patch to services.pm to 
> start the services in the proper order.

As stated in my previous message, have a look at 
http://www.packetfence.org/bugs/view.php?id=1651.
There is a git revision for a commit and that temporarily fix this issue.

Cheers!
dw.

--
[email protected] :: +1.514.447.4918 (x110) :: www.inverse.ca
Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence 
(www.packetfence.org)

On 2013-07-02, at 8:08 PM, Brian Lucas <[email protected]> wrote:

> This may have been the bug I was seeing and I have since switched to snort.  
> I can get around the bug in snort by starting packetfence manually, hitting 
> ctrl-c when it tries to start snort, then starting snort manually as well.  I 
> made another post about this and am hoping for a patch to services.pm to 
> start the services in the proper order.  Thanks for the input!
> Brian
> 
> 
> On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Derek Wuelfrath <[email protected]> wrote:
> Which version of PF ?
> Please have a look at: http://www.packetfence.org/bugs/view.php?id=1651
> 
> Derek
> 
> --
> [email protected] :: +1.514.447.4918 (x110) :: www.inverse.ca
> Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence 
> (www.packetfence.org)
> 
> On 2013-06-27, at 5:49 PM, Brian Lucas <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> When pf generated the file root owned it. Even with a chown pf:pf suricata 
>> won't connect to it. :/
>> 
>> On Jun 27, 2013 4:12 PM, "Derek Wuelfrath" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> I do see when I run ls -l /usr/local/pf/var that alert is a FIFO file owned 
>>> by root.  Should it be owned by root?
>> 
>> Should be owned by the same user that suricata is running from (i think it's 
>> pf)
>> 
>> Cheers!
>> dw.
>> 
>> --
>> [email protected] :: +1.514.447.4918 (x110) :: www.inverse.ca
>> Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence 
>> (www.packetfence.org)
>> 
>> On 2013-06-27, at 11:55 AM, Brian Lucas <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>> Gentlemen,
>>> 
>>> pfdetect is running and not showing any errors in pf/logs/pfdetect
>>> suricata is running however in /var/log/suricata.log i see the following 
>>> error:
>>> 27/6/2013 -- 04:16:06 - <Error> - [ERRCODE: SC_ERR_SOCKET(200)] - Error 
>>> connecting to socket "/usr/local/pf/var/alert": Connection refused
>>> 
>>> /usr/local/pf/var/alert is being generated at startup and I confirmed this 
>>> by shutting down packetfence and deleting the file, then restarting 
>>> packetfence with service packetfence start.
>>> 
>>> I do see when I run ls -l /usr/local/pf/var that alert is a FIFO file owned 
>>> by root.  Should it be owned by root?
>>> 
>>> I am really at a loss as to how to solve this problem and need suricata up 
>>> and running to get this setup finally up and running. Any help would be 
>>> appreciated in solving this latest issue.  I'm also sitting in IRC for a 
>>> bit as sacul if anyone wants to drop in there.
>>> 
>>> Brian
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
>>> 
>>> Build for Windows Store.
>>> 
>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev_______________________________________________
>>> PacketFence-users mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>> 
>> 
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
>> 
>> Build for Windows Store.
>> 
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
>> _______________________________________________
>> PacketFence-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>> 
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
>> 
>> Build for Windows Store.
>> 
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev_______________________________________________
>> PacketFence-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
> 
> Build for Windows Store.
> 
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> PacketFence-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
> 
> Build for Windows Store.
> 
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev_______________________________________________
> PacketFence-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:

Build for Windows Store.

http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

Reply via email to