It has been fixed for the upcoming PFv4.0.3
Thanks for letting us know.

Derek

--
Derek Wuelfrath
[email protected] :: +1.514.447.4918 (x110) :: www.inverse.ca
Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence 
(www.packetfence.org)

On 2013-07-19, at 2:32 PM, Fletcher Haynes <[email protected]> wrote:

> So after having fixed the firewall rule issue, when registering a gaming 
> device, I would get an error complaining about an Undefined subroutine 
> reevaluate_access on line 130 of gaming.pm. It looks like in 4.0.2, this line 
> was removed from gaming.pm:
> 
> use pf::enforcement qw(reevaluate_access);
> 
> Replacing that line resolved it.
> 
> So, should I be, like, opening bug reports somewhere for these?
> 
> -- 
> Fletcher Haynes <[email protected]>
> Systems Administrator/Network Services Consultant
> Willamette Integrated Technology Services
> Willamette University, Salem, OR
> Phone: 503.370.6016
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics
> Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics
> Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds.
> Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today!
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk_______________________________________________
> PacketFence-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics
Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics
Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds.
Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

Reply via email to