Hi Andi On 2013-08-28, at 11:55 AM, "Morris, Andi" <[email protected]> wrote:
> I’m just testing out some radius accounting violations on my dev box, but > anytime I add an accounting violation I get the following in packetfence.log: > > Aug 28 16:52:00 httpd.admin(0) WARN: Violation 1100011 is ignored: Invalid > trigger id: accounting::Accounting::TOT200GB at > /usr/local/pf/lib/pf/trigger.pm line 193. The trigger id must be "Accounting::TOT200GB" (remove the leading "accounting::"). > This is even when I put the exact trigger given in the admin guide, but > occurs even if I edit the sample accouting violation to have different > triggers, such as TOT100MB1D. > > I saw another post on the list regarding this, but it was given that 1 day is > the minimum interval for the accouting time period, which is fine, but have I > missed something else along the way? > > I’m using 4.0.4-2 -- [email protected] :: +1.514.755.3640 :: http://www.inverse.ca Inverse :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://sogo.nu) and PacketFence (http://packetfence.org) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Learn the latest--Visual Studio 2012, SharePoint 2013, SQL 2012, more! Discover the easy way to master current and previous Microsoft technologies and advance your career. Get an incredible 1,500+ hours of step-by-step tutorial videos with LearnDevNow. Subscribe today and save! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58040911&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ PacketFence-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
