Telnet Deauthentication seems unstable on the controller switched to RADIUS 
Deauthenticaion and no portlink problems so far.

Fra: Johannes Lavre [mailto:[email protected]]
Sendt: 20. januar 2014 14:43
Til: [email protected]
Emne: [PacketFence-users] Uplink ports Trapeze wifi controller

I have a strange issue with packetfence and my juniper(trapeze) wifi 
controller. Sometimes my packetfence server
Seems to disable all the uplinks port on my wifi controller. I have specified 
static uplink ports(1,2,3,4) in the switch.conf via the webgui
And the controller ip(10.235.1.14) address. The deauthentication method I use 
is telnet with the controller. Still sometimes after one or two
Weeks it disables all the ports on the controller. The first time I setup the 
server and tested deauthentication with snmp and it disabled
All the ports. Now it still seems to disable the ports once in a while. I have 
a fairly many clients using wireless service and I was forced to shut my server 
off
Because of the issue. Does anybody else have any experience or have runned in 
to a similar problem?


[Beskrivelse: Beskrivelse: cid:[email protected]]



Vennlig hilsen

Johannes Lavre
IKT-Fagarbeider
Horten Videregående skole


Direkte: 93 43 75 05
Jobb: 33 07 90 57
Sentralbord: 33 07 90 00
www.vfk.no<http://www.vfk.no/>
Facebook<http://www.facebook.com/#!/pages/Vestfold-fylkeskommune/136880609677063>
Twitter<https://twitter.com/#!/vestfoldfylke>



<<inline: image001.png>>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WatchGuard Dimension instantly turns raw network data into actionable 
security intelligence. It gives you real-time visual feedback on key
security issues and trends.  Skip the complicated setup - simply import
a virtual appliance and go from zero to informed in seconds.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=123612991&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

Reply via email to