Jake, Thank you for your sympathy ;)
At the moment, IOS isn't part of the equation - OSX and Win. We're still meanies that don't allow faculty BYOD. This will change, but not yet. You bring up valid, familiar concerns, but unfortunately, they are layer 8/9 issues, and I don't get to be part of those discussions! Really, I'm just making sure the open source path isn't an option, and that we really do have to spend many gold pieces on proprietary stuff. <sigh> Thanks all, Tim On 3/5/14 10:32 AM, "Sallee, Jake" <[email protected]> wrote: >Mr. Palmer: > >I am so, so sorry. You are about to find out the pains of shoehorning >Apple technology in to the enterprise. > >My personal dislike for all things Apple goes very deep, but that aside, >can I ask why the decision was made to go with Apple TVs? > >Was it for AirPlay? We use some programs here on our campus that enable >us to stream to/from IOS devices and it works. > >If I may give you a word of warning; I spent many, many man hours making >AirPlay and other Apple technologies work on our network. Instructors >were clamoring for the ability to use thier iPads in class. In less than >a semester all but 2-3 instructors stopped using it. Now if a single >prof uses it a week I would be surprised. > >It was a lot of work that required me to do some unholy things to my >network that I still feel guilty about, all to make a few people able to >use their shiny new toy. > >Short version: VERY carefully evaluate the business decision of using >Apple in the enterprise, in my 10+ years of experience it is almost >always a matter of personal preference and/or a status symbol thing. > >Regardless, I hope your implementation goes well. Good luck. > >Jake Sallee >Godfather of Bandwidth >System Engineer >University of Mary Hardin-Baylor > >900 College St. >Belton, Texas >76513 > >Fone: 254-295-4658 >Phax: 254-295-4221 >________________________________ >From: Tim DeNike [[email protected]] >Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2014 8:31 AM >To: [email protected] >Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] A Challenge - controlling mDNS and >Bonjour > >Ill just throw this out there.. mDNS/Bonjour is a bad idea and very >flakey in any enterprise network. It typically doesn't work well with >IGMP and other multicast helpers. It was never designed for it. > >Otherwise... The feature you are looking for would be part of roles in >packet fence. I don't know if the aruba allows ACLs to be assigned via >RADIUS or not though. > > >On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 3:35 PM, Palmer, Tim ><[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >A fine afternoon to all, > >I'm a happy 4.0.x user with an Aruba wireless network, at a private high >school. We're looking at rolling out Apple Tvs next year in many >classrooms, and will therefor need to control that nasty mDNS/Bonjour >traffic. We're looking for high granularity, more than just an mDNS >reflector the ability to basically specify that no user will see an >AppleTV that's not near the AP they are connected to. > >As far as I can tell, the only way to do this is with Aruba's Clearpass >policy manager system, which costs a bit, and will mean moving off of our >happy Packetfence system. > >The Challenge: Has any one even done any serious thinking about how to >accomplish this with Packetfence? Is there any chance it's even possible? > >Thank you for your thoughts, > >Tim Palmer > > >-------------------------------------------------------------------------- >---- >Subversion Kills Productivity. Get off Subversion & Make the Move to >Perforce. >With Perforce, you get hassle-free workflows. Merge that actually works. >Faster operations. Version large binaries. Built-in WAN optimization and >the >freedom to use Git, Perforce or both. Make the move to Perforce. >http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=122218951&iu=/4140/ostg.clkt >rk >_______________________________________________ >PacketFence-users mailing list >[email protected]<mailto:[email protected] >rceforge.net> >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users > > > >-------------------------------------------------------------------------- >---- >Subversion Kills Productivity. Get off Subversion & Make the Move to >Perforce. >With Perforce, you get hassle-free workflows. Merge that actually works. >Faster operations. Version large binaries. Built-in WAN optimization and >the >freedom to use Git, Perforce or both. Make the move to Perforce. >http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=122218951&iu=/4140/ostg.clkt >rk >_______________________________________________ >PacketFence-users mailing list >[email protected] >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Subversion Kills Productivity. Get off Subversion & Make the Move to Perforce. With Perforce, you get hassle-free workflows. Merge that actually works. Faster operations. Version large binaries. Built-in WAN optimization and the freedom to use Git, Perforce or both. Make the move to Perforce. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=122218951&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ PacketFence-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
