Thanks Loick, but I've worked it out now. I needed to update the 
/usr/local/pf/conf/radiusd/eap.conf with the directory of the radius 
certificates, rather than the packetfence web interface certificates.

Cheers,
Andi

-----Original Message-----
From: Loick Pelet [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: 06 March 2014 18:32
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] radius server presenting itself as 127.0.0.1

Hello Andi,

Both of your servers should have their /etc/hosts files well completed.
PacketFence sends the FQDN merging hostname and domain parameters in pf.conf.

Loick

On Mar 05-05:17PM, Morris, Andi wrote:
> Hi again all,
> I have a high-availability PF setup, using heartbeat and DRDB and all seems 
> to be running just fine. However I've just come to implement the production 
> self-signed certificates as laid out in 
> http://deployingradius.com/documents/configuration/ca_import.html and when I 
> enable the "validate server certificate" box on my windows client I am asked 
> to accept the certificate, which is expected as I haven't deployed the CA 
> certificate yet, however I'm seeing "127.0.0.1" presented as the radius 
> server name, rather than the actual hostname.
> 
> Is it possible that this is being pulled in from a packetfence variable 
> somewhere? If so is it possible to change this so that it sends the hostname? 
> I appreciate I'd need to configure the host to accept both of the hostnames 
> of my HA setup, but this is fine and I'd rather that than have something 
> generic like 127.0.0.1 in the allowed server list.
> 
> Also, I'm posting this to the PF mailing list before the freeradius list as I 
> have a suspicion that this is being pulled from a PF variable to do with the 
> HA setup. If this is not the case, and it is indeed something embedded in FR 
> I'll happily move this question there (complete with the obligatory debug 
> logs).
> 
> Cheers,
> Andi
> 
> -------------------------------------
> Andi Morris
> IT Security Officer
> Cardiff Metropolitan University
> T: 02920 205720
> E: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
> --------------------------------------
> 

> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> -------- Subversion Kills Productivity. Get off Subversion & Make the 
> Move to Perforce.
> With Perforce, you get hassle-free workflows. Merge that actually works. 
> Faster operations. Version large binaries.  Built-in WAN optimization 
> and the freedom to use Git, Perforce or both. Make the move to Perforce.
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=122218951&iu=/4140/ostg.
> clktrk

> _______________________________________________
> PacketFence-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users


--
[email protected] :: +1.514.447.4918 (x130) :: 
www.inverse.ca<http://www.inverse.ca/>
Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu<http://www.sogo.nu/>) and 
PacketFence
+(www.packetfence.org<http://www.packetfence.org/>)
gtalk or skype : lpelet.inverse

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subversion Kills Productivity. Get off Subversion & Make the Move to Perforce.
With Perforce, you get hassle-free workflows. Merge that actually works. 
Faster operations. Version large binaries.  Built-in WAN optimization and the 
freedom to use Git, Perforce or both. Make the move to Perforce.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=122218951&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subversion Kills Productivity. Get off Subversion & Make the Move to Perforce.
With Perforce, you get hassle-free workflows. Merge that actually works. 
Faster operations. Version large binaries.  Built-in WAN optimization and the
freedom to use Git, Perforce or both. Make the move to Perforce.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=122218951&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

Reply via email to